Architecture and backend
We separate what can stay from what must be rebuilt, then add the data model, API layer, and background jobs the prototype skipped.
Lovable, Bolt, Cursor, and Replit get you a working demo fast. Paying customers need more: secure sign-in, permissions, payments, a backend that holds up, and a way to know when something breaks. We add that layer and keep what already works.
AI coding tools are good at screens and happy paths. They are weaker at the parts nobody sees in a demo: who may read which data, what happens when a payment fails, how the database copes with production traffic, and how you roll back a bad release.
A Production Readiness Review makes those gaps visible. It covers architecture, code quality, security, scalability, backend and integrations, deployment, and technical debt, and ends with a recommendation for the next phase.
We separate what can stay from what must be rebuilt, then add the data model, API layer, and background jobs the prototype skipped.
Proper authentication, permissions checked on the server, and payment flows that handle failures, refunds, and subscriptions.
A security review, automated tests on the paths customers use most, and fixes for the gaps that appear once more than the founder is using the product.
Staging and production environments, CI/CD, logs, alerts, and backups, so you can deploy, watch, and roll back with confidence.
You see the findings and a recommendation before any larger build starts.
We read the code and use the app the way a customer and an attacker would.
Outcome Gaps ranked by launch risk
What stays, what gets refactored, what gets rebuilt, and why.
Outcome Target architecture and estimate
Data model, APIs, auth, payments, and third-party services built to production standards.
Outcome A backend you can trust with customer data
Security fixes, automated tests, and a manual pass over critical flows.
Outcome A release candidate
Cloud setup, CI/CD, alerts, and a rollback plan.
Outcome A launch you can observe
The prototype proves the idea. This is what changes before customers depend on it.
| Area | Typical AI-built prototype | Production-ready product |
|---|---|---|
| Access control | Basic sign-in, rules enforced in the browser | Role-based permissions checked on the server |
| Data | Schema generated for the demo | Data model designed for growth, with migrations and backups |
| Payments | Test-mode checkout | Failures, refunds, webhooks, and subscriptions handled |
| Testing | Manual clicking before a demo | Automated tests on critical flows |
| Deployment | One environment, manual deploys | Staging, CI/CD, and rollback |
| Monitoring | Customers report the bugs | Logs, alerts, and uptime checks |
Yes. We review the generated code, decide what can stay, what needs refactoring, and what is missing for production use, and plan the work from there.
No. The review shows which parts are safe to keep and which will fail once paying users, payments, and permissions arrive. We rewrite only what the current code cannot carry.
A focused technical assessment of architecture, code, security, scalability, backend, deployment, and technical debt. It ends with a prioritized list of gaps and a recommended next phase.
Yes. AI-assisted development speeds up iteration. Architecture, code review, security, and testing stay with experienced engineers.
Yes. For an AI-generated prototype, a focused technical assessment is the right first step before a larger build.