Finance and accounting
Invoice capture from email and PDF, three-way matching, payment approvals, bank reconciliation, and expense workflows that post straight to your accounting system.
Join.To.IT automates the manual work between your ERP, CRM, spreadsheets, and inboxes: approvals, data entry, documents, reporting, and AI-assisted tasks. We start with a process audit, automate one workflow as a pilot in 4–8 weeks, and then expand step by step instead of replacing every system at once.
In a typical mid-size company, orders arrive by email, someone retypes them into the ERP, a manager approves a discount in a chat, and finance rebuilds the same report in Excel every Monday. Each step is small. Together they cost hours every day, and every manual copy is a chance for an error.
Business process automation removes those hand-offs. We connect the systems you already use, move data between them without retyping, route approvals to the right person, and flag the cases that still need a human decision. Where a task involves reading documents or answering repeat questions, we add AI to the workflow.
You do not have to automate everything at once. Most of our engagements start with one process that has a clear cost, prove the result on it, and then move to the next one.
These are the workflows we automate most often. Each one can be a project on its own or part of a larger program.
Invoice capture from email and PDF, three-way matching, payment approvals, bank reconciliation, and expense workflows that post straight to your accounting system.
Lead routing, quote and contract generation, discount approvals, and CRM records that stay in sync with the ERP, so sales and finance see the same numbers.
Purchase requests, supplier orders, stock alerts, and production or warehouse tasks that move to the next step without a phone call.
Contracts, acts, and internal documents created from templates, signed electronically, routed for approval, and archived with search.
Data pulled from the ERP, CRM, and spreadsheets into one place, with management reports that update on their own instead of being rebuilt every week.
AI that reads incoming documents, classifies requests, drafts replies, and answers staff questions from your own knowledge base, with a person approving anything that matters.
Each stage ends with something you can review before approving the next one.
We map the current process with the people who run it, measure where time goes, and list the systems and data involved. Usually 1–2 weeks.
Outcome A ranked list of processes with the expected effect of automating each
We automate the process with the clearest payback, connect the systems it needs, and run it alongside the old way until the numbers hold. Usually 4–8 weeks.
Outcome A working workflow and measured time or error savings
We extend the approach to the next processes in the order agreed after the audit, reusing the integrations built for the pilot. Usually 2–6 months.
Outcome Connected workflows across teams
We monitor the integrations, fix what breaks when a vendor changes an API, and adjust workflows as your business rules change.
Outcome Automation that keeps working after launch
The price depends on how many systems are involved and how clean the data is. These are indicative ranges; we give a fixed estimate after the audit.
| Option | Pilot | One process | End-to-end program |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it covers | Audit plus automation of one simple workflow with one or two systems | A full process across several systems, with approvals, notifications, and reporting | Several connected processes across departments, plus support |
| Typical timeline | 3–6 weeks | 1–3 months | 3–9 months, in phases |
| Good fit when | You want to test the approach before a larger budget | One process clearly costs the most time or errors | Automation is part of a wider operations plan |
| Typical budget | $8,000–$20,000 | $20,000–$60,000 | From $60,000 |
Ongoing support is billed monthly and depends on the number of integrations. You own the code, the workflows, and the documentation.
Replacing the ERP or CRM is sometimes the right call. More often the current systems are fine and the gaps between them are the problem.
| Question | Replace the ERP or CRM | Phased automation |
|---|---|---|
| When you see results | After migration and staff retraining | After the first pilot, in weeks |
| Disruption to daily work | High during the switch | One process at a time |
| Budget | Large up-front licence and implementation cost | Approved stage by stage |
| Partial automation | Rarely possible | The default: automate what pays back, keep the rest manual |
| When it makes sense | The current system cannot support how the business works | The systems work, but people move data between them by hand |
We work with the APIs, databases, and file exports your systems already have. Where a low-code tool such as Make, n8n, or Power Automate is enough, we use it; where it is not, we write the integration.
Take a manufacturer that receives orders from dealers by email. A manager reads each order, checks stock in the ERP, types the order in, and sends a confirmation. At 80 orders a day, that is most of one person’s week, and typos turn into wrong shipments.
The pilot reads incoming orders, extracts the items and quantities, checks stock and prices in the ERP, creates a draft order, and sends the dealer a confirmation. The manager only reviews orders the system flags: unknown items, prices outside the agreed range, or stock shortages.
A pilot on one simple workflow usually costs $8,000–$20,000. Automating a full process across several systems is typically $20,000–$60,000, and a multi-department program starts around $60,000. The main cost drivers are the number of systems, the quality of their APIs, and how many exceptions the process has. We give a fixed estimate after the audit.
Start with a process that runs often, follows clear rules, and has a visible cost: hours of data entry, delayed approvals, or recurring errors. Order entry, invoice processing, and weekly reporting are common first choices. The audit ranks your processes by effort and expected savings, so the first pilot is the one most likely to pay back.
In most cases, yes. We connect systems through their APIs, databases, or file exports, and we have worked with common ERPs, CRMs, and accounting tools. If a system has no API, we look at scheduled exports, database access, or email parsing. We confirm what is possible with each of your systems during the audit, before you commit to a build.
The audit takes one to two weeks. A pilot on one process usually runs four to eight weeks, including a period where the new workflow runs alongside the old one. Larger programs are delivered in phases over three to nine months, with each phase producing a working result rather than waiting for one big launch.
Where it helps, yes. Rules and integrations handle most of the work; AI is useful for reading unstructured documents, classifying requests, and answering questions from your knowledge base. We keep a person in the loop for decisions that carry risk and log every AI action, so you can check what it did and why.